<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Review: Styling Tools</title>
		<link>http://bare.forumotion.net/review-styling-tools-f17/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>Read or share your reviews on Hairdryers, Straighteners, Crimpers and Curlers.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:50:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>GHD Straighteners (MK4's)</title>
			<link>http://bare.forumotion.net/review-styling-tools-f17/ghd-straighteners-mk4-s-t15.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Candy Perfume Girl</dc:creator>
			<description>Well, I've only compared them to what I've used and so far, the GHD's are miles ahead.



They are costly, yes, but they have lasted me over a year so far and still going strong. 



Of course, you can almost get the same result from using a steam iron and greaseproof paper, but if you want fast results, not have to go over the same section endlessly, don't want to singe the shyte out of your locks and want reliability- I say shell out for the best.

I use mine for curling too, its faster  ...</description>
			<category>Review: Styling Tools</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://bare.forumotion.net/review-styling-tools-f17/ghd-straighteners-mk4-s-t15.htm#19</comments>
			<guid>http://bare.forumotion.net/review-styling-tools-f17/ghd-straighteners-mk4-s-t15.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>